Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chicago Tribune calls GB's QB situation 'risky business'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porky88" data-source="post: 227632" data-attributes="member: 489"><p>Anyone who said that was correct not delusional. </p><p></p><p>Just because a player is a rookie doesn't mean he doesn't know how to play football. I mean that's what this is. Let's not complicate the NFL. It might be a different type of "beast" but it's still football. </p><p></p><p>You know why people get predictions wrong all the time?</p><p></p><p>People expect a team to be bad because they have younger players or in experience. What difference does it make as long as your good. Peterson is good and so will be Rodgers.</p><p></p><p>You can't possibly sit here and say because Jackson has started in the NFL, he's better. Rodgers PT against Dallas is better than anything I've seen from Jackson. You can make that argument. That isn't so much praise of Aaron Rodgers but rather a slap in the face to how bad the QB's in this division are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porky88, post: 227632, member: 489"] Anyone who said that was correct not delusional. Just because a player is a rookie doesn't mean he doesn't know how to play football. I mean that's what this is. Let's not complicate the NFL. It might be a different type of "beast" but it's still football. You know why people get predictions wrong all the time? People expect a team to be bad because they have younger players or in experience. What difference does it make as long as your good. Peterson is good and so will be Rodgers. You can't possibly sit here and say because Jackson has started in the NFL, he's better. Rodgers PT against Dallas is better than anything I've seen from Jackson. You can make that argument. That isn't so much praise of Aaron Rodgers but rather a slap in the face to how bad the QB's in this division are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
mradtke66
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 11:33 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:03 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 9:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chicago Tribune calls GB's QB situation 'risky business'
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top