Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chemistry Problem
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="all about da packers" data-source="post: 162847" data-attributes="member: 227"><p>While I don't want to take this thread off-topic, I think that we should give B-Jack a break.</p><p></p><p>He is a rookie that has seen extensive reps at RB in practice since we are so thin at that position.</p><p></p><p>More importantly, he was playing his 2nd game in only five days.</p><p></p><p>That's a hard thing even for vets, but to a rookie like Jackson, it must be quite difficult. I don't think he looked tenative as much as he did plain slow, and it may very well in part be because he didn't have the chance to get an appropriate amount of rest.</p><p></p><p>I think the most concerning thing is that our o-line didn't respond well to the way the Jags starting DT were playing. You could say they also had 4 days of rest, but then again so did the entire Jags team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="all about da packers, post: 162847, member: 227"] While I don't want to take this thread off-topic, I think that we should give B-Jack a break. He is a rookie that has seen extensive reps at RB in practice since we are so thin at that position. More importantly, he was playing his 2nd game in only five days. That's a hard thing even for vets, but to a rookie like Jackson, it must be quite difficult. I don't think he looked tenative as much as he did plain slow, and it may very well in part be because he didn't have the chance to get an appropriate amount of rest. I think the most concerning thing is that our o-line didn't respond well to the way the Jags starting DT were playing. You could say they also had 4 days of rest, but then again so did the entire Jags team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
52 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 12:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:40 PM
Draft Talk
R
NFC North Predictions
Latest: rmontro
Today at 8:54 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 12:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chemistry Problem
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top