Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Charles Woodson getting released
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 489890" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Calling Driver one of the Packers’ best WRs is funny at this point. Jones was better than Driver in 2011 and so was Jennings, Nelson, and Cobb. With the benefit of hindsight it should be obvious to any serious fan Driver should not have been paid $2.3M this season. As mentioned many times now, he was a healthy inactive on a team with WRs inactive because of injury. That’s a clue that shouldn’t be too hard to decipher for a thinking fan. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Why is it some of the fans complaining about Woodson’s release don’t seem to acknowledge his 2013 salary and the consequence of retaining him on the cap? Why don’t they detail which players will have to be let go if they retain him? Even beyond the cash and cap considerations, thinking a 37 year-old Woodson is worth $10M in 2013 is just nuts IMO. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">There are legitimate reasons to criticize Thompson but some of the fans who criticize his every “controversial” or unpopular move reveal themselves as Favre-first fans <strong>IMO</strong>. How else can you explain their extreme bias against a GM who led the franchise to a championship? How else can you explain them ignoring the cash and salary cap consequences of these moves? How else can you explain them posting they hope former Packers perform well <em>against the Packers</em>? After all, for them Favre was/is the franchise. Now that their idol is officially retired, what the hell they’re rooting for is beyond me. Perhaps they’re just waiting for his number to be retired and then they’ll be on their way to another franchise? <em>Maybe the Jets or Vikings?</em></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: black">Back to Woodson; check out Tom Oates’ column: </span><span style="color: #000000"><a href="http://host.madison.com/sports/columnists/tom_oates/tom-oates-cutting-charles-woodson-was-right-call-for-packers/article_0a198da4-77d1-11e2-ba5c-001a4bcf887a.html" target="_blank">http://host.madison.com/sports/columnists/tom_oates/tom-oates-cutting-charles-woodson-was-right-call-for-packers/article_0a198da4-77d1-11e2-ba5c-001a4bcf887a.html</a></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 489890, member: 4300"] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Tahoma]Calling Driver one of the Packers’ best WRs is funny at this point. Jones was better than Driver in 2011 and so was Jennings, Nelson, and Cobb. With the benefit of hindsight it should be obvious to any serious fan Driver should not have been paid $2.3M this season. As mentioned many times now, he was a healthy inactive on a team with WRs inactive because of injury. That’s a clue that shouldn’t be too hard to decipher for a thinking fan. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Tahoma]Why is it some of the fans complaining about Woodson’s release don’t seem to acknowledge his 2013 salary and the consequence of retaining him on the cap? Why don’t they detail which players will have to be let go if they retain him? Even beyond the cash and cap considerations, thinking a 37 year-old Woodson is worth $10M in 2013 is just nuts IMO. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Tahoma]There are legitimate reasons to criticize Thompson but some of the fans who criticize his every “controversial” or unpopular move reveal themselves as Favre-first fans [B]IMO[/B]. How else can you explain their extreme bias against a GM who led the franchise to a championship? How else can you explain them ignoring the cash and salary cap consequences of these moves? How else can you explain them posting they hope former Packers perform well [I]against the Packers[/I]? After all, for them Favre was/is the franchise. Now that their idol is officially retired, what the hell they’re rooting for is beyond me. Perhaps they’re just waiting for his number to be retired and then they’ll be on their way to another franchise? [I]Maybe the Jets or Vikings?[/I][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=black]Back to Woodson; check out Tom Oates’ column: [/COLOR][COLOR=#000000][url]http://host.madison.com/sports/columnists/tom_oates/tom-oates-cutting-charles-woodson-was-right-call-for-packers/article_0a198da4-77d1-11e2-ba5c-001a4bcf887a.html[/url][/COLOR][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
51 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Charles Woodson getting released
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
