Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Changing of the guard on the DL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 559094" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>The problem is you want perfection without compromise. That's not how life works. We've been over this before. Bringing in an extra lineman at the expense of the an ILB doesn't improve the defense on the whole.</p><p></p><p>It might improve the pass rush.</p><p></p><p>A 3-3 creates more natural running lanes to my eye. Without two ILBs to clog up the middle, both A-gaps are suddenly vulnerable.</p><p></p><p>A 3-3 is also more likely to weaken our under (linebacker provided) coverage. This is the biggest thing I don't like about a 3-3. Draw up a simple cover-2 zone and cover-2 man against 3-1-1 offensive personnel. Who covers who? Hopefully you start seeing problems and weaknesses immediately.</p><p></p><p>And yes, straight up cover-2. A defense needs an emergency, safe check for unscouted looks. For most teams, that means some form of cover-2.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 559094, member: 4199"] The problem is you want perfection without compromise. That's not how life works. We've been over this before. Bringing in an extra lineman at the expense of the an ILB doesn't improve the defense on the whole. It might improve the pass rush. A 3-3 creates more natural running lanes to my eye. Without two ILBs to clog up the middle, both A-gaps are suddenly vulnerable. A 3-3 is also more likely to weaken our under (linebacker provided) coverage. This is the biggest thing I don't like about a 3-3. Draw up a simple cover-2 zone and cover-2 man against 3-1-1 offensive personnel. Who covers who? Hopefully you start seeing problems and weaknesses immediately. And yes, straight up cover-2. A defense needs an emergency, safe check for unscouted looks. For most teams, that means some form of cover-2. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
shockerx
PikeBadger
Arodgers12
Catamount1971
Latest posts
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: AmishMafia
16 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Heyjoe4
24 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: milani
32 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Heyjoe4
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: sschind
48 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Changing of the guard on the DL
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top