Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Can we keep all our upcoming free agents?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 437134" data-attributes="member: 2846"><p>What? Not you to Jack! The OP asks if we can keep <strong>ALL</strong> of our coming FAs.</p><p> </p><p>It did not ask if we should or if it was a good idea. It did not ask what TT's MO was, or if they were good, irreplaceable or anything like that. If you think we can keep all of our FAs, with the salary cap, then you are fooling yourself. For goodness sakes! There is a chance we lose Wells later today to Free agency! Of course we are going to lose FAs.</p><p> </p><p>It was JenningsLongCatch that made up this idea that I had 'Blind Faith' relying on TT drafting better players than Raji, Jennings, and CM3. The incomprehensible argument got to a point where the straw man from his straw man argument was throwing out red herrings!</p><p> </p><p>In post #12 I only stated that:</p><p>1. We cannot keep all of our FAs</p><p>2. We will still be a good team because TT is good at bringing in talent.</p><p> </p><p>Here is my opinion in some bullet points:</p><p> </p><p>1. TT has filled the roster with solid depth.</p><p>2. There are a few impact players</p><p>3. It would be great to keep the impact players</p><p>4. It will be difficult to keep the impact players because:</p><p>__a. There are so many</p><p>__b. There is a cap limit on spending</p><p>__c. They are in demand and they will be expensive to keep</p><p>5. It is not a condition of winning if we cannot retain all the impact players: We arguably have more right now than any other team.</p><p>6. This is because our GM has shown that he is good at drafting quality players. Please note that one of the problems is having too many impact players. All of these impact players were drafted or acquired in some manner by TT.</p><p>7. There is no reason to think that TT will suddenly stop aquiring quality players.</p><p> </p><p>Now, tell me. Where is the flaw in logic there?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AmishMafia, post: 437134, member: 2846"] What? Not you to Jack! The OP asks if we can keep [B]ALL[/B] of our coming FAs. It did not ask if we should or if it was a good idea. It did not ask what TT's MO was, or if they were good, irreplaceable or anything like that. If you think we can keep all of our FAs, with the salary cap, then you are fooling yourself. For goodness sakes! There is a chance we lose Wells later today to Free agency! Of course we are going to lose FAs. It was JenningsLongCatch that made up this idea that I had 'Blind Faith' relying on TT drafting better players than Raji, Jennings, and CM3. The incomprehensible argument got to a point where the straw man from his straw man argument was throwing out red herrings! In post #12 I only stated that: 1. We cannot keep all of our FAs 2. We will still be a good team because TT is good at bringing in talent. Here is my opinion in some bullet points: 1. TT has filled the roster with solid depth. 2. There are a few impact players 3. It would be great to keep the impact players 4. It will be difficult to keep the impact players because: __a. There are so many __b. There is a cap limit on spending __c. They are in demand and they will be expensive to keep 5. It is not a condition of winning if we cannot retain all the impact players: We arguably have more right now than any other team. 6. This is because our GM has shown that he is good at drafting quality players. Please note that one of the problems is having too many impact players. All of these impact players were drafted or acquired in some manner by TT. 7. There is no reason to think that TT will suddenly stop aquiring quality players. Now, tell me. Where is the flaw in logic there? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Capitol 8805
monte smith
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 11:33 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:03 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 9:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Can we keep all our upcoming free agents?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
