Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Can the "catch rule" be fixed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 763613" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>Not to be a "stick in the mud"....but a PI in the NFL, when called, assumes that the receiver would have made the catch, by placing the ball at the spot of the interference. You are correct, when it appears that the receiver had no chance to catch the ball, then the penalty is not suppose to be called.</p><p></p><p>A holding call whether its on the line or in the secondary doesn't really assume anything, other than a violation of the rules was committed. Much like the PI call, if it assumed something, it would try to "correct the play" to end the way the referee judged it would probably end without the hold.</p><p></p><p>Why doesn't offensive pass interference result in the ball going to the defense? Had the interference not occured, wouldn't the defense have intercepted it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 763613, member: 7261"] Not to be a "stick in the mud"....but a PI in the NFL, when called, assumes that the receiver would have made the catch, by placing the ball at the spot of the interference. You are correct, when it appears that the receiver had no chance to catch the ball, then the penalty is not suppose to be called. A holding call whether its on the line or in the secondary doesn't really assume anything, other than a violation of the rules was committed. Much like the PI call, if it assumed something, it would try to "correct the play" to end the way the referee judged it would probably end without the hold. Why doesn't offensive pass interference result in the ball going to the defense? Had the interference not occured, wouldn't the defense have intercepted it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Latest posts
Lions Give Jared Goff a 4 year, 212M Extension
Latest: Dantés
16 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
33 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
55 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 8:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Can the "catch rule" be fixed?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top