Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Can the "catch rule" be fixed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 762141" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>If you have a better system than the one that is currently being used and you feel it will get more calls correct, I am all ears. Or maybe you aren't concerned about getting the call correct and prefer no replay? I have no clue where you stand and your last sentence is contradictory within itself and doesn't make a whole lot of sense.</p><p></p><p>This subject has been brought up every year and is beat to death. Some prefer no review, some prefer making sure the call is correct by whatever means and some fall in between those two lines of thinking. Personally, I don't see a big problem with the review process, I think the bigger issue is making sure the catch rule is clearly defined for all situations and take it from there. I don't see anyone claiming review doesn't work for determining if 2 feet were in bounds, if the runner crossed the goal line, etc. Seems like some are confusing the replay process with the confusion of the catch rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 762141, member: 7261"] If you have a better system than the one that is currently being used and you feel it will get more calls correct, I am all ears. Or maybe you aren't concerned about getting the call correct and prefer no replay? I have no clue where you stand and your last sentence is contradictory within itself and doesn't make a whole lot of sense. This subject has been brought up every year and is beat to death. Some prefer no review, some prefer making sure the call is correct by whatever means and some fall in between those two lines of thinking. Personally, I don't see a big problem with the review process, I think the bigger issue is making sure the catch rule is clearly defined for all situations and take it from there. I don't see anyone claiming review doesn't work for determining if 2 feet were in bounds, if the runner crossed the goal line, etc. Seems like some are confusing the replay process with the confusion of the catch rule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
weeds
scheeler
Team Ronny
kf323
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: OldSchool101
4 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 3:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:57 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Can the "catch rule" be fixed?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top