Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zero2Cool" data-source="post: 123193" data-attributes="member: 43">You did nitpick and were busting my balls. You did a good job of it. Being ignorant isn't a bad thing, I've said I was ignorant  on this very forum. Don't be so defensive.I apologize that my question was 'dumb' in your view.  Not sure why you stooped so low, you got your way, I got mine.  You didn't answer the question either. Or I missed it. Could you please refresh my memory? You posted several nice trio's of WR. What I asked after that  was when did they have a trio of WR of the same talent?    I apologize for not being more blunt.   I should also add this before you nitpick your way out of it. When was the last time those teams you mentioned had three WR of that talent? OR atleast three WR that were really good?Raiders 2002 and before that?Bengals  2006 and before that?Cardinals 2006 and before that?Colts 2006 and before that?I guess that's kind of vague for you as well, isn't it? How about this.  Three good WR, meaning that you can take any one of the three and put them on another team and they'd be either the number ONE or TWO starter as WR.   Is that clear or do I need to go more in depth? :shrug:Furthermore, I'm trying to say getting three WR that you can take any one of the three and they'd be a starter on another team is hard to come by.  I'd have liked the Packers to have done more(I'm a fan, I always want more, but I'm reasonable and understanding with how the system works) to get other WR or to KEEP WR they had. (ie, Mayes, Walker, Glenn, etc). To say the Packers have failed at giving Brett good talented WR to throw to. I think is a bit of a stretch and thats coming from a Brett homer.  I think the management has given Brett targets and good ones at that. They seem to get injured or suspended. d'oh!  Is that the managements fault? Yes and no.  Injuries are unpredictable (unless the player was injury prone prior to joining the Packers). The Koren situation I think was a good risk. I really think he'll be a good player for the Packers next year as the 3rd WR and KR.Hopefully that clears everything up! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" data-shortname=":)" />  If Brett had any of those sets of WR we'd be freakin lethal!   I think Brett's skills have diminished, but thats not to say hes not still a very good QB. He's far better than we have on the roster and I'm confident he's the best QB in the NFC.I see your point, 66. I think if we had TE's that could that would be more important than ANOTHER good WR.  Remember, good WR don't seem to fall off the trees, unless of course your the Patriots! Damn them! Damn them! Damn them!</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,312 (members: 0, guests: 1,312)

Latest posts

The Crew - 2026
- Latest: weeds
- 46 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
- Latest: El Guapo
- Yesterday at 10:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
- Latest: milani
- Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum