Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1098529" data-attributes="member: 10086">Well imo there’s a difference with Sten. He took over for a 10th ranked scoring Offense Hackett. He started at #14 scoring then #12 scoring then #8 scoring. So that trend is exactly what you’d prefer going into 2025. So were there clear cut circumstances that caused regression (missing QB or weapons etc?) YESWe lost our starting Center and we now are aware that Tom and Banks dealt with injuries throughout the season that negatively affected play.Then we did lose Reed (#1 weapon in 2023,2024) and Watson missed 1/2 season. Together they missed 18 games and didn’t finish 19 games cumulatively, which is substantial imo.Then we lost Kraft, who’s a clear top weapon in Green Bay. 3 of our 5 best Offensive weapons didn’t finish 24 cumulative games in 2025. That’s a ton of missing time. Yet Sten n Co finished at #16 in scoring, which is respectable. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume had we finished 12 of those 24 lost games with weapons? We’d be ranked Top #10 area or thereabouts.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,104 (members: 0, guests: 1,104)