Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bye Week Adjustments and or Changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Un4GivN" data-source="post: 515386" data-attributes="member: 8782"><p>I didn't say the Packers weren't talented... I said they aren't good right now.</p><p></p><p>Also is this the same 9ers team that was playing without BOTH of their top receivers and still put up 500 yards of offense? And the amazing athletes the 9ers have got blown out in consecutive weeks... In the two weeks following the Packers game, combined the 9ers were just barely able to surpass the total yards they put up in week 1.</p><p></p><p>I do blame this more on coaching than players but you are making Kaep sound like a top 5 passer. He is not. The receivers were far too open on many occasions and if you go back and watch the game the defensive backfield had a horrible game that was criticized and talked about all week. With the players involved admitting how bad they played.</p><p></p><p>But just to hit on a couple points that you made:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I agree, Franklin does look good. But so did Starks in 2011, I reserve thinking he is a saving grace or a permanent staple in the offense until he at least starts one game.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Bach I think you are giving him a little too much credit Quote from <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/09/23/refo-gb-cin-week-3/" target="_blank">PFF</a> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Jolly has played less and less each week, could be a conditioning thing, but I think we can all agree his impact week 1 was much more than in 2 and 3.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If by many years you mean 3 than I agree... This line is no better than the 2010-2011 team.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I like the corners, and if Shields can be a more consistent #1 corner and House and Heyward continue to get better I think CB could be a team strength. But remember this is the same team that gave 208 yrds and 143 yds on consecutive weeks to a teams number 1 receiver and ranks 27th in pass defense. I be excited to see how we do on Megatron who always gives us fits.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Can't wait to see Burnett get back.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Jordy is a beast, and Finally has looked good this year. Still think there is more potential there but hes getting there.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I dont agree at all with the OLB assessment... Matthews left the game on Sunday and the pass rush was just sad to say the least. I havent seen much from anyone to give me too hope there yet. Potential maybe, but no results to show that yet.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I agree with the Hawk and Jones assessment. Was really impressed with Jones play this season.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Rodgers is pretty damn good... Can't disagree with that. But he hasn't played to his contract if you ask me so far. But I think he will get it all together yet.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">And yes we all know Matthews is good if he can stay on the field which isn't all that common.</li> </ul><p></p><p>Negative</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Ranked 26th in turnover ratio</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Ranked 27th in total defense</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Ranked 28th in scoring defense. Anytime you have to score on average 30 points a game to win that is a negative. On the flip side Seattle is 1st in scoring defense allowing 9 PPG. Which would you rather Rodgers have to score 30 or 10?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Defense that at times looks like it couldn't stop a high school team. Especially in the second half.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Injury bug is hitting us hard</li> </ul><p>There is no doubt this team has the potential to win out... POTENTIAL. But games against Chicago, Detroit, Dallas, Atlanta will not be won by losing the turnover battle, making stupid coverage errors and Rodgers needs play like the best player on the field more often than not.</p><p></p><p>If they don't play any better than right now. I could honestly see an 8-8 record very easily. But I fully dont expect that. I think players come back, we get some cohesion on the offensive line. And that defense is able to stiffen up some. I see 10-6 as a realistic finish. With 11-5 as a possibility. But you don't play like the Packers have and consistently win in this league.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Un4GivN, post: 515386, member: 8782"] I didn't say the Packers weren't talented... I said they aren't good right now. Also is this the same 9ers team that was playing without BOTH of their top receivers and still put up 500 yards of offense? And the amazing athletes the 9ers have got blown out in consecutive weeks... In the two weeks following the Packers game, combined the 9ers were just barely able to surpass the total yards they put up in week 1. I do blame this more on coaching than players but you are making Kaep sound like a top 5 passer. He is not. The receivers were far too open on many occasions and if you go back and watch the game the defensive backfield had a horrible game that was criticized and talked about all week. With the players involved admitting how bad they played. But just to hit on a couple points that you made: [LIST] [*]I agree, Franklin does look good. But so did Starks in 2011, I reserve thinking he is a saving grace or a permanent staple in the offense until he at least starts one game. [*]Bach I think you are giving him a little too much credit Quote from [URL='https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/09/23/refo-gb-cin-week-3/']PFF[/URL] [*]Jolly has played less and less each week, could be a conditioning thing, but I think we can all agree his impact week 1 was much more than in 2 and 3. [*]If by many years you mean 3 than I agree... This line is no better than the 2010-2011 team. [*]I like the corners, and if Shields can be a more consistent #1 corner and House and Heyward continue to get better I think CB could be a team strength. But remember this is the same team that gave 208 yrds and 143 yds on consecutive weeks to a teams number 1 receiver and ranks 27th in pass defense. I be excited to see how we do on Megatron who always gives us fits. [*]Can't wait to see Burnett get back. [*]Jordy is a beast, and Finally has looked good this year. Still think there is more potential there but hes getting there. [*]I dont agree at all with the OLB assessment... Matthews left the game on Sunday and the pass rush was just sad to say the least. I havent seen much from anyone to give me too hope there yet. Potential maybe, but no results to show that yet. [*]I agree with the Hawk and Jones assessment. Was really impressed with Jones play this season. [*]Rodgers is pretty damn good... Can't disagree with that. But he hasn't played to his contract if you ask me so far. But I think he will get it all together yet. [*]And yes we all know Matthews is good if he can stay on the field which isn't all that common. [/LIST] Negative [LIST] [*]Ranked 26th in turnover ratio [*]Ranked 27th in total defense [*]Ranked 28th in scoring defense. Anytime you have to score on average 30 points a game to win that is a negative. On the flip side Seattle is 1st in scoring defense allowing 9 PPG. Which would you rather Rodgers have to score 30 or 10? [*]Defense that at times looks like it couldn't stop a high school team. Especially in the second half. [*]Injury bug is hitting us hard [/LIST] There is no doubt this team has the potential to win out... POTENTIAL. But games against Chicago, Detroit, Dallas, Atlanta will not be won by losing the turnover battle, making stupid coverage errors and Rodgers needs play like the best player on the field more often than not. If they don't play any better than right now. I could honestly see an 8-8 record very easily. But I fully dont expect that. I think players come back, we get some cohesion on the offensive line. And that defense is able to stiffen up some. I see 10-6 as a realistic finish. With 11-5 as a possibility. But you don't play like the Packers have and consistently win in this league. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
20 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: CarryTheG14
27 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
29 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 9:26 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:57 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bye Week Adjustments and or Changes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
