Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bulaga May Move to Left Tackle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 490826" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">jaybadger, How dare you imply we shouldn't argue just because we lack - or possess incomplete - information! </span><span style="font-family: 'Wingdings'"><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> </span><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"> If moving Bulaga improves the LT spot that is what should be done IMO. RT is much easier to fill than LT and LT was by far the biggest problem in pass protection last season. It remains the most important spot on the OL IMO. </span><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"> I appreciate your qualifying your remarks but stunts can't be ignored and what if the defender over the LG lines up on his inside shoulder or rushes that gap? </span><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"> But Newhouse did get help sometimes this season. He did get a chip here and a double team now and then. And he still gave up over <strong>40 pressures</strong>!</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">As far as bodies on the team to play RT, on their depth chart, the Packers had Barclay as the backup then Datko, and then newcomer Kevin Hughes. I thought Barclay progressed pretty well and played well against a very good 9ers D in the playoff game. I have more confidence in Barclay improving at RT than Newhouse at LT because of their relative number of snaps. I don't know enough about Datko or Hughes to comment on them. But consider this: Going into this draft do you have more confidence that the Packers can find a starting RT or LT? IMO the obvious answer to that question also applies to the current roster.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">Another question with (IMO) an obvious answer: Would you feel better if McCarthy and/or Thompson announced that Newhouse was <span style="font-family: 'Arial'">definitely </span>going to be the starter at LT? </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">Good discussion though - even if jaybadger thinks it's ignorant. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 490826, member: 4300"] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial]jaybadger, How dare you imply we shouldn't argue just because we lack - or possess incomplete - information! [/FONT][FONT=Wingdings];) [/FONT][FONT=Georgia][/FONT][FONT=Arial] If moving Bulaga improves the LT spot that is what should be done IMO. RT is much easier to fill than LT and LT was by far the biggest problem in pass protection last season. It remains the most important spot on the OL IMO. [/FONT][FONT=Georgia][/FONT][FONT=Arial] I appreciate your qualifying your remarks but stunts can't be ignored and what if the defender over the LG lines up on his inside shoulder or rushes that gap? [/FONT][FONT=Georgia][/FONT][FONT=Arial] But Newhouse did get help sometimes this season. He did get a chip here and a double team now and then. And he still gave up over [B]40 pressures[/B]![/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]As far as bodies on the team to play RT, on their depth chart, the Packers had Barclay as the backup then Datko, and then newcomer Kevin Hughes. I thought Barclay progressed pretty well and played well against a very good 9ers D in the playoff game. I have more confidence in Barclay improving at RT than Newhouse at LT because of their relative number of snaps. I don't know enough about Datko or Hughes to comment on them. But consider this: Going into this draft do you have more confidence that the Packers can find a starting RT or LT? IMO the obvious answer to that question also applies to the current roster.[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]Another question with (IMO) an obvious answer: Would you feel better if McCarthy and/or Thompson announced that Newhouse was [FONT=Arial]definitely [/FONT]going to be the starter at LT? [/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]Good discussion though - even if jaybadger thinks it's ignorant. ;) [/COLOR][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
tynimiller
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 2:15 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:29 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bulaga May Move to Left Tackle
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
