Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1095131" data-attributes="member: 10086">I think a big part of this variance of opinion might be the grade scale we use?   Here’s a generic “C” scale expectation wise. Feel free to disagree that’s fine but this is why Evan is not = to some below. Not everyone gets a Gold medal.RD1 Great 3++ year starterRD2 Good 3++  year StarterRD3 Average 3++ yr StarterRD4 Potential 3++ year StarterRD5 Great ST or heavy rotationalRD6 Good ST or rotational pieceRD7 hopeful ST or developing project rotational work across Rook contractThese are all historically recent RD4 area draft selection who I believe surpassed their C grade expectation. That doesn’t mean I dole out automatic A grades across the board though eitherThese are all similar area drafted players. Notice I didn’t go lopsided and pick Rasheed in RD7 or Bakhtiari in RD6. Those are easy A to A+ to draft area expectation imo.I do NOT believe Evan Williams would be drafted ahead of TJ Lang or Josh Sitton or Zach Tom. I don’t even believe it would be a consideration of picking Evan if THOSE 3 prospects were on the board when Brian was on the clock.#109 TJ Lang   A#111 Evan Williams   B#116 Colby Wooden C+/B-#122 JC Tretter B- #132 Mike Daniels B/B+ #132 Romeo Doubs B#134 Jamaal Williams B#135 Josh Sitton A #137 Dean Lowry B-#140 Zach Tom A *PS. feel free to grade these drafted players as an exercise my feelings won’t be hurt! lol </blockquote>

Total: 1,072 (members: 2, guests: 1,070)