Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Brett Favre: discussing all possibilities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nelanator" data-source="post: 244897" data-attributes="member: 889"><p>No and no. Cutting ties with Favre in the first place was a testament to the fact that Brett Favre and his legacy was not bigger than the Green Bay Packers. Letting him suit up again just for the sake of it would mean that they would have to cut a guy to make room on the roster for just one day, it would be a slap in the face to Rogers, and it would say the exact oposite of what they said when they traded Favre last offseason. </p><p></p><p>And I should have said in my previous post that the only scenario close to this is signing him to a one-day contract <strong>in the offseason</strong>. Then they don't have to worry about the roster size and it is a nice, quiet, and symbolic way to let him end his career officially as a Packer. </p><p></p><p>Sorry guys, I just think that your notion of the Packers possibly allowing him to play agian for just one game and just for the sake of it is absolutely proposterous. Would help his legacy? Of course. But is it even feasible? Not at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nelanator, post: 244897, member: 889"] No and no. Cutting ties with Favre in the first place was a testament to the fact that Brett Favre and his legacy was not bigger than the Green Bay Packers. Letting him suit up again just for the sake of it would mean that they would have to cut a guy to make room on the roster for just one day, it would be a slap in the face to Rogers, and it would say the exact oposite of what they said when they traded Favre last offseason. And I should have said in my previous post that the only scenario close to this is signing him to a one-day contract [B]in the offseason[/B]. Then they don't have to worry about the roster size and it is a nice, quiet, and symbolic way to let him end his career officially as a Packer. Sorry guys, I just think that your notion of the Packers possibly allowing him to play agian for just one game and just for the sake of it is absolutely proposterous. Would help his legacy? Of course. But is it even feasible? Not at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
rmontro
Pkrjones
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
59 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 5:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 4:23 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 2:53 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: milani
Today at 2:09 PM
Introduce Yourself
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Brett Favre: discussing all possibilities
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top