Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 561209" data-attributes="member: 4199">Ah.  That's some of my confusion.  I'd call that a 3-technique more than a 4.Does he need to get stronger in the leg/butt area?  Yeah.  But he looks like a 3-4 end in every other way.  His frame says, "I can carry 10-20 more pounds and I'd look good doing it."  He's a more natural big guy, if that makes sense (because very few people are actually naturally that big.)Neal was more of a 275 pound guy carrying too much weight.  Good weight yes, but his frame wasn't handling it.  Based purely on his current, better playing frame, I think he's a more ideal 4-3 hybrid scheme strong side end that kicks down to 3-technique in nickel.</blockquote>

Total: 554 (members: 3, guests: 551)