Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1042835" data-attributes="member: 10086">I kinda half agree here. Let me explain. First you hit the nail on the head in bold. Obviously we both know it’s on any given Sunday. I remember reading before Sunday that the Vikings had been in the lead the vast majority of this year. Some teams are built to get in a lead and stay there. Some are not. Some are great “come from behind” teams. The Vikings had proven to be that first one… until yesterday. They had a 28 point lead and let us in the game up 6 points with 10:16 left in the game.All that after this start.Missed FGINTMissed FGINTTurnover on DownsNow I’m not taking away anything from them as far as they ARE a quality team. But we had 6 Turnovers (on downs) and 2 Missed FG and this was a 2 point win. Another 2 minutes in that game clock or pair of timeouts and this could’ve been a Vikings loss. There’s no excuse for not putting us away earlier except that they just could not.Just look at the Lions last night.  When it was 27-35 and Seattle mounted a nice comeback? They answered with a nail in the coffin TD. THAT is winning in convincing fashion. The Vikings “Started” in convincing fashion but definitely did not end convincingly. Now that could be that GB is much better a team than how we started.</blockquote>

Total: 251 (members: 2, guests: 249)