Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1053075" data-attributes="member: 10086">Yeah but 1.9M vs 1.3M isn’t a compelling argument.  Especially when the 1.3M gets you 1 year. The 1.9M gets you 4yrs and we all know that each passing year that 600K salary differential closes each passing contract year. It’s more like 400K best case savings. You can’t even get a Subway 12” cold cut combo for that unless you 86 the drink!Well I think you just nailed my answer there in your question. I shouldn’t even have to go past that. The only backup QB we brought aboard I can think of that was Kizer who was a higher pick, but we’re desperate to ditch Randall the problem CB and the Browns were just desperate to ditch a long shot project. It was like exchanging items in a yard sale. LolOk Brian Brohm was the only other one but he was a 2nd Rounder from 2006? So we’re 3 of 4, 4 of 6 something like that.Really the rest of the QB we are talking about are a group of Day 3 selections. Later 4th at the earliest to later 7th. Which really wasn’t my argument either way. I said go get one FA. There’s always several advantage there are other guys like Malik that have matured over a couple seasons vs a Green Pea Draft pick.Carson Wentz signed 1yr 3.3M /2.2guar with K.C.  It’s just an example of a guy that is a very reliable backup</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 930 (members: 0, guests: 930)