Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="okcpackerfan" data-source="post: 411966" data-attributes="member: 4994">It should be said that the best player on the best team isn't necessarily more valuable to his team then the best player on a mediocre team that makes the playoffs (Rodgers vs Tebow debate). It isn't a default award to the best player on the best team. I will say that if Tebow and the Broncos win out, depending on how he plays, I am unsure of who I would vote for if I had a vote. And I am the biggest packers homer I know. I don't like the mindset people have gotten into lately, most notably in college football in regards to the heisman, on giving the award to the best player on the best team. The NFL MVP goes to the player deemed "most valuable" and at this point in the season I believe that person IS aaron rodgers. The Heisman is supposed to go the "most outstanding college player" which it rarely ever goes to anymore. Charles Woodson was one of the few that won this award that it actually lived up to the purpose of the heisman (even though Michigan was the best team in the country, he was "outstanding""</blockquote>

Total: 367 (members: 2, guests: 365)