Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brady MVP - not Rodgers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 411872" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #141414">IMO the MVP should be renamed BPY: Best Player of the Year. To me the winner should be as simple as, which player had the best season. Because if it's truly "most valuable" than my vote goes to the guy who proved he is "most valuable" by not playing. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #141414">(Aside: I remember "way back when" when some Packers fans would post or say something like, 'Favre is worth 10 wins all by himself'. At the time I thought no rational fan could believe that but there's a reason "fan" is short for "fanatic". Anyway, then the 2005 season happened and the Packers won 4 games.)</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #141414">Fast forward to this season and answer this question: How many games is Peyton Manning "worth". The Colts go from 10-6 to 0- and horrible and the biggest difference is the absence of one player. Now, I confess to not following the Colts closely. Or at all. So I don't know of the other losses that team has suffered or additions it gained. But I do know their organization relied foolishly way too much on one individual. And if you are sticking to the strict interpretation of "most valuable" to a team, then it's gotta be Peyton, doesn't it? (As opposed to Manning Peyton, packerfan4ever. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" />) What more proof would you need? But that in itself is foolish right? I agree and that's why if they don't want to change the name of the award I hope there will at some point be a broad consensus (if there's not one already) that what the award really means is BPY. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #141414">Hub Arkush, publisher of Pro Football Weekly, lifelong Bears (and Cubs!) fan, said last night on the radio: 'If Rodgers isn't the unanimous choice for MVP something is very, very wrong.' Yep. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 411872, member: 4300"] [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#141414]IMO the MVP should be renamed BPY: Best Player of the Year. To me the winner should be as simple as, which player had the best season. Because if it's truly "most valuable" than my vote goes to the guy who proved he is "most valuable" by not playing. [/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#141414](Aside: I remember "way back when" when some Packers fans would post or say something like, 'Favre is worth 10 wins all by himself'. At the time I thought no rational fan could believe that but there's a reason "fan" is short for "fanatic". Anyway, then the 2005 season happened and the Packers won 4 games.)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#141414]Fast forward to this season and answer this question: How many games is Peyton Manning "worth". The Colts go from 10-6 to 0- and horrible and the biggest difference is the absence of one player. Now, I confess to not following the Colts closely. Or at all. So I don't know of the other losses that team has suffered or additions it gained. But I do know their organization relied foolishly way too much on one individual. And if you are sticking to the strict interpretation of "most valuable" to a team, then it's gotta be Peyton, doesn't it? (As opposed to Manning Peyton, packerfan4ever. :)) What more proof would you need? But that in itself is foolish right? I agree and that's why if they don't want to change the name of the award I hope there will at some point be a broad consensus (if there's not one already) that what the award really means is BPY. [/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#141414]Hub Arkush, publisher of Pro Football Weekly, lifelong Bears (and Cubs!) fan, said last night on the radio: 'If Rodgers isn't the unanimous choice for MVP something is very, very wrong.' Yep. [/COLOR][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
54 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 9:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: rmontro
Today at 9:07 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 8:51 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 8:27 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brady MVP - not Rodgers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
