Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Blake Martinez
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 848956" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>So far, LBs are similar in respect to neither play the pass particularly well. Your ILB pair should balance more, 1 leaning pass D effective and 1 leaning Run D effective. We really haven’t had that to make a proper evaluation IMO. So the only logical thing we can do is point fingers in the meantime. I get that. But it doesn’t fix our deficiencies.</p><p></p><p>We need a stellar LB who can drop into coverage. Blake is NOT a coverage Backer, but as you pointed out he’s being used as such. That’s called being spread thin.</p><p>Raven Green was the best compliment to Blake thus far, but he’s not an ideal fit either. I all but can promise you.. if we had a true above average coverage <strong>ILB </strong></p><p>We wouldn’t be having this debate about who’s at fault.</p><p>Goodson is nothing more than a “depth” patch, which we also needed. That didn’t correction the problem.</p><p></p><p>I was going to say, the next best thing meantime is to use one of our bigger Safeties. I think we’ve dabbled there already to no avail. I’m perplexed what’s going on with Burks who I believe was supposed to be our answer. It’s the million dollar ? Right now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 848956, member: 10086"] So far, LBs are similar in respect to neither play the pass particularly well. Your ILB pair should balance more, 1 leaning pass D effective and 1 leaning Run D effective. We really haven’t had that to make a proper evaluation IMO. So the only logical thing we can do is point fingers in the meantime. I get that. But it doesn’t fix our deficiencies. We need a stellar LB who can drop into coverage. Blake is NOT a coverage Backer, but as you pointed out he’s being used as such. That’s called being spread thin. Raven Green was the best compliment to Blake thus far, but he’s not an ideal fit either. I all but can promise you.. if we had a true above average coverage [B]ILB [/B] We wouldn’t be having this debate about who’s at fault. Goodson is nothing more than a “depth” patch, which we also needed. That didn’t correction the problem. I was going to say, the next best thing meantime is to use one of our bigger Safeties. I think we’ve dabbled there already to no avail. I’m perplexed what’s going on with Burks who I believe was supposed to be our answer. It’s the million dollar ? Right now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
monte smith
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 1:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 5:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Blake Martinez
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top