Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bishop signs with the Vikings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 502361" data-attributes="member: 5830"><p>As SpartaChris noted, it's being widely reported that Bishop's hamstring prevented him from OTA's and minicamp. I guarantee that half of you monkeys would be accusing TT of throwing money away on another injured player had Bishop started the season on the PUP list or reinjured the hamstring.</p><p> </p><p>I'm fully behind this move. Our forums have been filled with "fans" accusing the team of having a terrible medical staff. Here the organization makes a move to rid itself of a big injury risk and we crucify them anyway.</p><p> </p><p>While I agree that we lack both depth and elite players at ILB, I don't think that keeping Bishop was the answer. I'd rather see Green Bay have the roster space to acquire a veteran ILB or find a young buck (like Bishop once was) without a significant injury.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Guapo, post: 502361, member: 5830"] As SpartaChris noted, it's being widely reported that Bishop's hamstring prevented him from OTA's and minicamp. I guarantee that half of you monkeys would be accusing TT of throwing money away on another injured player had Bishop started the season on the PUP list or reinjured the hamstring. I'm fully behind this move. Our forums have been filled with "fans" accusing the team of having a terrible medical staff. Here the organization makes a move to rid itself of a big injury risk and we crucify them anyway. While I agree that we lack both depth and elite players at ILB, I don't think that keeping Bishop was the answer. I'd rather see Green Bay have the roster space to acquire a veteran ILB or find a young buck (like Bishop once was) without a significant injury. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:26 PM
Draft Talk
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 9:26 PM
Draft Talk
Amish 57th Annual Draft Contest - by proxy
Latest: Pkrjones
Yesterday at 9:19 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Round 5, pick 163 Jacob Monk, OL
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 9:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 9:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bishop signs with the Vikings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top