Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Einstein McFly" data-source="post: 501972" data-attributes="member: 6663"><p>He WAS our best hitter on defense. We haven't seen him play in a loooong time and there are a bunch of guys who get paid big bucks to evaluate guys football players who have been watching him since last year. Why do people assume he's at his best just because he says so? At his peak was he a better ILB than Hawk? Oh hell yes. Would be be better if he was a step slower? Probably not. Does he do us any good on the bench if he's injured again? Nope. Do we need money for guys who don't have his injury history? Yeah, maybe we do. If he's at 100% it would be dumb to cut him, but people need to stop acting like there aren't a bunch of totally acceptable reasons to cut him at this point.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 454 (members: 3, guests: 451)