Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bills now listening to offers for Lynch
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jess" data-source="post: 298687" data-attributes="member: 1495"><p>Because the USFL was the same as the UFL? They were buying legit college talent. Herschel Walker, Reggie, Steve Young. The UFL is to the NFL what, well, Arena Football is to the NFL. I don't think we'll ever see a #1 overall pick type player bought by the UFL.</p><p></p><p>What would you rather spend, let's say a 4th round pick on? QB? We're good. WR? We're good. OL? I would imagine that would be addressed with picks 1-3. DL? Probably good. LB? We're good. DB? Again, picks 1-3. We don't have all that many holes, so trading one of our picks to fill a hole with a guy who WHEN STARTING doesn't have a season under 1,000 yards is better than drafting a depth player at a position we're already strong at. And you're right, 1,000 yards isn't what it used to be, but it's better than the 600 we'll get out of Jackson if we stand pat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jess, post: 298687, member: 1495"] Because the USFL was the same as the UFL? They were buying legit college talent. Herschel Walker, Reggie, Steve Young. The UFL is to the NFL what, well, Arena Football is to the NFL. I don't think we'll ever see a #1 overall pick type player bought by the UFL. What would you rather spend, let's say a 4th round pick on? QB? We're good. WR? We're good. OL? I would imagine that would be addressed with picks 1-3. DL? Probably good. LB? We're good. DB? Again, picks 1-3. We don't have all that many holes, so trading one of our picks to fill a hole with a guy who WHEN STARTING doesn't have a season under 1,000 yards is better than drafting a depth player at a position we're already strong at. And you're right, 1,000 yards isn't what it used to be, but it's better than the 600 we'll get out of Jackson if we stand pat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Pugger
Pkrjones
Latest posts
P
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Pugger
11 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Dantés
28 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
33 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
33 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bills now listening to offers for Lynch
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top