Hmn. I don't know, after the SB almost everything has been debunked, from "Rodgers can't win important games" to "they're too young and innexperienced".
One thing that I heard all year was about our run D. How we weren't any good on run D. Which was a total mistake. We were average on run D because early in the year our D was overagressive, which led to A LOT of QB scrambles. Plus we played nickel 2-4 almost all the time, which gave us less beef to stop the run, but after we excelled in 09 to stop the run, Capers figured it was best to focus on the pass and play the run only on certain circumstances. Fact is, we never allowed more than 1 running TD in a game, and we consistantly had the advantage in time of possession.
So, yeah, the Packers' run D is vulnerable is a misconception I'd point out.