Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
BEAST Mode!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Incubes12" data-source="post: 281413" data-attributes="member: 1689"><p>The main argument against bringing in Lynch to me seems to be that, in essence, we are a passing team and that our running game, in playing 2nd fiddle to the pass, really doesn't need to be anything more than 1 solid guy. This is a great counterargument to that and it's yet another reason why bringing in another good back couldn't hurt. </p><p></p><p>The issue isn't whether or not Ryan Grant is a good running back, it's that it couldn't hurt to give him some good help (Jackson is pretty average) as long as it's available at low cost, which it is in this situation. Trust me, I LOVE what Ryan Grant has done for this team, he has quietly become one of the top backs in the league and he consistently produces for the team. He's a noble guy and I don't think the addition of Lynch in a somewhat limited role would upset him. </p><p></p><p>My only other worry would be that Lynch wouldn't be okay with just a 3rd down role right now. However, I tried to make the point that there's no harm in letting him sit, I think that we might see him sit for awhile unless he accepts a role like this because I don't think there are many teams out there that would look to him as a #1 back.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Incubes12, post: 281413, member: 1689"] The main argument against bringing in Lynch to me seems to be that, in essence, we are a passing team and that our running game, in playing 2nd fiddle to the pass, really doesn't need to be anything more than 1 solid guy. This is a great counterargument to that and it's yet another reason why bringing in another good back couldn't hurt. The issue isn't whether or not Ryan Grant is a good running back, it's that it couldn't hurt to give him some good help (Jackson is pretty average) as long as it's available at low cost, which it is in this situation. Trust me, I LOVE what Ryan Grant has done for this team, he has quietly become one of the top backs in the league and he consistently produces for the team. He's a noble guy and I don't think the addition of Lynch in a somewhat limited role would upset him. My only other worry would be that Lynch wouldn't be okay with just a 3rd down role right now. However, I tried to make the point that there's no harm in letting him sit, I think that we might see him sit for awhile unless he accepts a role like this because I don't think there are many teams out there that would look to him as a #1 back. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 2:22 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
BEAST Mode!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top