Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1015993" data-attributes="member: 17987">Bakh has reached the point for me where he should only be viewed as a "bonus" player from here on out. Meaning that you more or less don't count him as much of a factor one way or the other (on the field) and any time he is healthy and able to play is just "bonus". I do think he could be a good mentor and he is generally seeming to be a well-liked guy and good locker room presence. And there is some value in that. But as they say, the best ability is availability....So for me the only way you really see about bringing him back is if you're planning on spending high capital early on getting a new starting tackle. If you're able to draft a guy like Fashanu, Alt, Latham, etc (not saying we would reasonably be able to get any/all of them) with the intention of them being able to be a day-one starter *if need be* then potentially having a healthy Bakh to be able to start and mentor that guy for a year (or however long) is not a bad thing. But I don't want to see us drafting a 6th round project LT and banking on Bakh being the starter and then having to start that guy or shift everyone all around when Bakh gets hurt. Basically then the short of it for me:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">If you're able to draft a player that you believe has the quality to be a day-one potential starter at LT and can make the numbers make sense to bring back Bakh then go for it. Best-case scenario he stays healthy and you have one of the best LTs in the league for Love for the next year and he can mentor your new LT you drafted and get them ready to step in next year. Worst-case scenario he gets hurt again but you've already drafted a starting-quality player who's ready to step in </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">If you aren't in a position to draft a day-one starter at LT or aren't willing to invest your capital in that then I think you have to move on and pivot to a different solution for your first choice LT. As above he'd be a great "bonus" player but I don't think it would be wise to rely on him being healthy at all. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">All that said if GM Rodgers decides he wants Bakh on the Jets or whoever comes along with any semi-respectable trade offer I'd probably take it </li> </ol></blockquote>

Verification

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 880 (members: 0, guests: 880)

Latest posts

M
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
- Latest: Magooch
- 31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
- Latest: Pugger
- 53 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
- Latest: milani
- Today at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
- Latest: milani
- Today at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
- Latest: milani
- Today at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum