Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1009977" data-attributes="member: 7261">Not really.  They would have to add to that a clause the reduced the players salary a set % as well.  That would prevent any kind of Mickey Mouse with players feigning a ghost injury and still getting full pay.  That aspect would have to be put into contracts and would somewhat negate the guaranteed portion.Then, if they set it up so that said player had to be placed on season ending IR and the cap credit would be for the following year, I could see it working and not be that much different than cutting a high paid vet right before the 53 man cut down.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,090 (members: 0, guests: 1,090)