Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1008969" data-attributes="member: 7261">Yeah and I don't know if I would care either way.  Would I side with the Billion dollar company or the guy that was guaranteed $61M and made much more than that, while barely playing under the contract?I understand "taking care of your own", but one of the talking points of these guaranteed contracts was "what if a player gets injured and his career ends suddenly?"  Sort of a built in insurance policy.  Fine, but what if the Player barely plays under that new contract?  I know, the team didn't have to offer him the deal.  I would much rather see the NFL "guarantee" players income against injury, by each team paying a second party an insurance premium on every player.  A player gets injured, the team can part ways and the players gets his insurance pay.No doubt Bahk's career may be over, but if it is, he will walk away from the NFL at the age of 32 a very rich man, with the ability to do just about anything.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 84 (members: 0, guests: 84)