Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 911603" data-attributes="member: 9033">I'm using the 1st round parameter because that's what happened in Green Bay. Using 2nd and 3rd round picks isn't what Green Bay did. Also, <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":laugh:" title="Laugh    :laugh:" data-shortname=":laugh:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":laugh:" title="Laugh    :laugh:" data-shortname=":laugh:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":laugh:" title="Laugh    :laugh:" data-shortname=":laugh:" /> at Eli Manning being an "elite QB" when they drafted Jones. You can keep being cozy in your belief that using 1st round picks is okay for a team when they have a great QB but it's just not true and I would expect pretty much every top-10 QB in the NFL to be completely pissed of their team drafted their replacement in the 1st round (with the obvious exception of teams that have players who don't want to come back).Finally, who in the world thinks Cam Newton is a good QB anymore?! He's the ONLY guy being replaced by a 1st round pick on your list. Otherwise your list includes one second round pick and then 3rd round or later. There is kind of a huge difference between drafting a QB in the 3rd vs trading up in the 1st.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 467 (members: 0, guests: 467)