Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 911480" data-attributes="member: 7261">The Packers found several "nice fellows" for a number of years, they just weren't very good QB's <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />.  I think we are all "afraid" of that scenario repeating itself, but even in the best of circumstances, that window was slowly opening anyway, this just throws it wide open. The positive side for the organization with a trade, they could potentially hurry up that process more than they would have been able to if Rodgers just retired and rode off into the sunset in the next 5 or so years.  I look back at what the Rams did with an aging John Hadl, they milked the Packers for two first-rounders, two second-rounders and a third-rounder, sound familiar?  The Rams used those picks to vault them into a contending team.  Rodgers is probably no John Hadl, but he very well could be the Packers finally getting some good Karma on that situation 47 years later.</blockquote>

Total: 826 (members: 2, guests: 824)