Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Arrogant General Managers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 911480" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>The Packers found several "nice fellows" for a number of years, they just weren't very good QB's <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" />. I think we are all "afraid" of that scenario repeating itself, but even in the best of circumstances, that window was slowly opening anyway, this just throws it wide open. </p><p></p><p>The positive side for the organization with a trade, they could potentially hurry up that process more than they would have been able to if Rodgers just retired and rode off into the sunset in the next 5 or so years. I look back at what the Rams did with an aging John Hadl, they milked the Packers for two first-rounders, two second-rounders and a third-rounder, sound familiar? The Rams used those picks to vault them into a contending team. Rodgers is probably no John Hadl, but he very well could be the Packers finally getting some good Karma on that situation 47 years later.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 911480, member: 7261"] The Packers found several "nice fellows" for a number of years, they just weren't very good QB's ;). I think we are all "afraid" of that scenario repeating itself, but even in the best of circumstances, that window was slowly opening anyway, this just throws it wide open. The positive side for the organization with a trade, they could potentially hurry up that process more than they would have been able to if Rodgers just retired and rode off into the sunset in the next 5 or so years. I look back at what the Rams did with an aging John Hadl, they milked the Packers for two first-rounders, two second-rounders and a third-rounder, sound familiar? The Rams used those picks to vault them into a contending team. Rodgers is probably no John Hadl, but he very well could be the Packers finally getting some good Karma on that situation 47 years later. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: gopkrs
51 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 2:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:49 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:23 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Arrogant General Managers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top