Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1044581" data-attributes="member: 10086">Yeah but you could say that about 1/2 of the 2nd Round selections from 2023. Really you could say that about all the #1 overall selections that have ever missed significant time inside their first 20 potential games for that matter.So my contention in regard to the bold above is injury alone in a smaller sample size ~25 games is still not solid an indicator on career success rates. So what do we use as a better indicator? On Field productionLuke played in 12 contests in his Rookie season. Had he stayed at that production across a 17 game stretch?592 yards 3 TD’s. IMO that shows pretty good promise just in a generic estimation of how he’s played. Now if we want to say he’s “injured too much” etc ok I get that it’s frustrating as heck. But taking that into applying that Bust label by projecting injuries out like that across 4 seasons, it’s too sporadic. I really don’t even want to speak like that about him I wouldn’t do it to you either. It’s like bad mojo I’ll probably sprain my ankle. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/eek.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!    :eek:" data-shortname=":eek:" /></blockquote>

Total: 892 (members: 5, guests: 887)