Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Croak" data-source="post: 433700" data-attributes="member: 2367">First I don't deny I used "dinged" as I wanted to. Habitually still stands. Jenkins was listed on the Eagles injury report in various weeks for 1)triceps 2)knee 3)Thumb 4) groin. Now lets add other voices to the mix;  Jenkins is a bit of a risk because of his age and injuries, but he’s been one of the more underrated linemen in the league for the last few years.  Rod Marinelli and Lovie Smith have a solid track record squeezing production out of veteran linemen, and Jenkins would be a worthy guy to go after. – Rosenthal, NBC Sports At 30 years old, however, Jenkins in a significant injury risk. Not just because of his age but because of his history. – Adam Oestman, Bears Huddle However, most teams will factor in his injury history, and that may cause them to look elsewhere, opening the door for New England to sign him to a low-risk, high-reward kind of contract. – Bleacher Report Jenkins, who had seven sacks in 11 games last season, carries some risk, as he has suffered significant injuries in two of the past three seasons. – Denver Post  And in an article on the Packers Defensive shortcomings, USA Today writes; Cullen Jenkins was too much of an injury risk and wouldn't be re-signed. But I guess I'm just making up this "false" injury risk thing.</blockquote>

Total: 638 (members: 1, guests: 637)