Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are we really equipped to run a dominant 3-4?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 432885" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>I don't think we spend so much time in nickel because of a lack defensive line (though that could be part of it), but rather because teams would rather throw against us.</p><p> </p><p>We're normally very tough to run against. Pickett, Raji, and Bishop make for a very tough middle. If you come out in base (and you don't have a world-beater tight end), we'll come out in base.</p><p> </p><p>If you tendencies and/or formation tells Capes "pass," he'll trot out nickel. This also puts Woodson in the best position to succeed at Saftey-Nickel-Backer instead of covering the outside guy. I make the argument that this is almost a 'base' set anyway.</p><p> </p><p>Woodson (though slipping now) is a pretty sure tackler. He's basically a linebacker. So loop back around to my previous statement that our OLBs are more like defensive ends in nickel. We have our 4 'linemen' (Matthews, Raji, Pickett, and the other guy) and three linebackers (Woodson, Hawk, Bishop.) That looks an awful lot like a Front 7 to me, albeit one that is stacked to stop the pass, not the run.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 432885, member: 4199"] I don't think we spend so much time in nickel because of a lack defensive line (though that could be part of it), but rather because teams would rather throw against us. We're normally very tough to run against. Pickett, Raji, and Bishop make for a very tough middle. If you come out in base (and you don't have a world-beater tight end), we'll come out in base. If you tendencies and/or formation tells Capes "pass," he'll trot out nickel. This also puts Woodson in the best position to succeed at Saftey-Nickel-Backer instead of covering the outside guy. I make the argument that this is almost a 'base' set anyway. Woodson (though slipping now) is a pretty sure tackler. He's basically a linebacker. So loop back around to my previous statement that our OLBs are more like defensive ends in nickel. We have our 4 'linemen' (Matthews, Raji, Pickett, and the other guy) and three linebackers (Woodson, Hawk, Bishop.) That looks an awful lot like a Front 7 to me, albeit one that is stacked to stop the pass, not the run. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are we really equipped to run a dominant 3-4?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top