13 Times Champs
Cheesehead
Hawk does suck.
AJ Hawk should be done. He's being paid like he's a top LB, but he sucks.
He's always late on the calls
He can't tackle
He can't get off a block to save his life
He's mediocre in coverage
He sucks. Hate all you want. Disagree if you want. But if I'm GM, I'll take chance on a rookie first rounder before I anoint him the starter for the 2012 season.
I say cut Hawk, give Bishop the Green Dot, draft an ILB and have him and DJ Smith compete in training camp for the starting job
Folks, the Packers are only 7 Million under the salary cap. Don't get your hopes set on bringing in a veteran free agent. The Packers have to sign Wells and consider Finley. Flynn will probably go. I have a strong feeling we're going to see more draft, develop, and work with what is already on the roster.
Which is why I'm quite sure Driver is going to be released. Before Sherrod got hurt, I'd say that Clifton would gone for sure. The cap is a harsh mistress, especially to aging players who are well paid.
Folks, the Packers are only 7 Million under the salary cap. Don't get your hopes set on bringing in a veteran free agent. The Packers have to sign Wells and consider Finley. Flynn will probably go. I have a strong feeling we're going to see more draft, develop, and work with what is already on the roster.
True but a DE/DT that can occupy 2 players in his own right would have negated some of that double teaming of Matthews.The problem with the Packers 3-4 scheme is this:
The 3-4 is built around the idea that the offense will have to guess who the fourth pass rusher will be on every play. By not having a pass rusher opposite Clay Matthews, the offense always knows who the fourth pass rusher is. Take the Steelers 3-4. By having Woodley and Harrison, the defense needs to account for both players on each pass play. The offense cannot just slide protection or move a tight end to one side because that linebacker might not be rushing the passer. This is why Matthews was double and triple teamed all season.
That's why on another thread in answer to the question do you favor a stud OLB or DE (if you could only get one) I favored OLB. In Capers' D IMO OLBs are more important than DL. They are able to make plays vs. the run, pressuring the passer and in coverage where a DL oridnarily only can make plays in two of those three. Yes, a stud DE takes some pressure off of the coverage unit but IMO two stud OLBs would be huge next season.The 3-4 is built around the idea that the offense will have to guess who the fourth pass rusher will be on every play.
Good point. A pay site notes that Clifton's cap figure of $5.703M and Driver's $5M would be completely off the books (no prorated signing bonus). Collins has a cap figure of $5.05M for 2012 but if he can't play, and we will know in March one way or another, about $2M of his signing bonus would be prorated into the 2012 cap. Like all Packers fans I hope Collins' dings the cap for $5.05M - he's worth more than that. But if Clifton and Driver aren't re-signed, that's a cool $10.7M off the cap.Which is why I'm quite sure Driver is going to be released. Before Sherrod got hurt, I'd say that Clifton would gone for sure. The cap is a harsh mistress, especially to aging players who are well paid.
Well I'd be happy with either but where we're picking I don't see us getting a stud DE or OLB unless Thompson does something to move up in the draft.
We are going to have alot of draft picks this year. Depending on how his board looks, if he sees alot of talent that should be available in round 4 (if we do end up with a couple of extra 4th rounders),he may give up a 2nd or 3rd to move up and grab an impact player. Course none of us knows the mind of the master.Well I'd be happy with either but where we're picking I don't see us getting a stud DE or OLB unless Thompson does something to move up in the draft.
The problem is when you get into the third and fourth round you are probably looking down the road for these guys to become a factor. Most often they need time to develop. That's ok but I think we need a guy or guys that can come in immediately and make a difference.We are going to have alot of draft picks this year. Depending on how his board looks, if he sees alot of talent that should be available in round 4 (if we do end up with a couple of extra 4th rounders),he may give up a 2nd or 3rd to move up and grab an impact player. Course none of us knows the mind of the master.
That's why on another thread in answer to the question do you favor a stud OLB or DE (if you could only get one) I favored OLB. In Capers' D IMO OLBs are more important than DL. They are able to make plays vs. the run, pressuring the passer and in coverage where a DL oridnarily only can make plays in two of those three. Yes, a stud DE takes some pressure off of the coverage unit but IMO two stud OLBs would be huge next season.
I agree. And I also think a lot of folks are gonna be disappointed when Thompson doesn't do something to move up in the draft.
That would be great. Create a threat opposite of Matthews and teams can't roll protection to his side.
You do realize that not only did Grant rework his deal and only made 1 Million last year, that he outplayed his contract at the end of this year. Forget the Giants game, if we bring that into play we should drop everybody. Grant should be the main back again, the more carries he had, the better he was. Starks looked soft after about the 3rd week even though he was given all the backing he could have ever wanted. Grant against all odds, and against the coaching staff not giving him his due practice and play, outperformed.That is true, but the Packers can gain significant cap space by releasing Clifton and Driver. You throw Ryan Grant into that equation and all of a sudden the cap space is there.
You do realize that not only did Grant rework his deal and only made 1 Million last year, that he outplayed his contract at the end of this year. Forget the Giants game, if we bring that into play we should drop everybody. Grant should be the main back again, the more carries he had, the better he was. Starks looked soft after about the 3rd week even though he was given all the backing he could have ever wanted. Grant against all odds, and against the coaching staff not giving him his due practice and play, outperformed.