Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are we going to Miss Malik Willis?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1100437" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Well Love had played in all but 3 games of a a 55 game career and 1 of those games we purposely held him out (Week 18). So there’s no reason to conclude that he’s not going to play this year or he’s going to suddenly be more injury prone than any other QB.</p><p></p><p> Very few teams who lose their starting QB are going to click along without skipping a beat deep into the playoffs. I can’t think of a team that wouldn’t he concerned and that includes the best out there KC, LA, Seattle, Denver, Buffalo or you name it. There are examples of some backups filling in and doing nicely but very few backups in the history of Champions were backup QB’s. Nick Foles? I don’t like those odds no matter which team you name so welcome to the club.</p><p></p><p>Past maybe Joe Flacco or Jameis Winston I wouldn’t have much confidence in any backup QB leading a Super Bowl charge. I’m not even sure I would want Joe Flacco and I’ve got a ton of respect for his ability to maintain at 41yrs old.</p><p></p><p> I’d put Tyrod Taylor in a tier with the top 6-10 rated backup QB grouping. He’s actually been consistently solid and mostly with bad defenses. Imagine him with a Top 5 ranked Defense. With the Giants and Jets he’s posted an average 94.5% Passer rating since 2022. The 2026 Packers are all around better than the Jets or Giants imo.</p><p></p><p>Tyrod .486 and Malik .500 hold virtually the same Win % at .500 area. Malik 98.9 passer in very small sample has outplayed Tyrod 87.7% passing, but not dramatically. Malik TD:INT is 2:1 and Tyrod TD:INT ratio is a smidge better at 2.1:1. Tyrods 5.6 per carry is actually a better rushing average than Malik 5.5 per and who would guess that? Malik 200% has the youth and longevity upside, but Tyrod by far has more raw experience to step into a pressure cooker and remain poised.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1100437, member: 10086"] Well Love had played in all but 3 games of a a 55 game career and 1 of those games we purposely held him out (Week 18). So there’s no reason to conclude that he’s not going to play this year or he’s going to suddenly be more injury prone than any other QB. Very few teams who lose their starting QB are going to click along without skipping a beat deep into the playoffs. I can’t think of a team that wouldn’t he concerned and that includes the best out there KC, LA, Seattle, Denver, Buffalo or you name it. There are examples of some backups filling in and doing nicely but very few backups in the history of Champions were backup QB’s. Nick Foles? I don’t like those odds no matter which team you name so welcome to the club. Past maybe Joe Flacco or Jameis Winston I wouldn’t have much confidence in any backup QB leading a Super Bowl charge. I’m not even sure I would want Joe Flacco and I’ve got a ton of respect for his ability to maintain at 41yrs old. I’d put Tyrod Taylor in a tier with the top 6-10 rated backup QB grouping. He’s actually been consistently solid and mostly with bad defenses. Imagine him with a Top 5 ranked Defense. With the Giants and Jets he’s posted an average 94.5% Passer rating since 2022. The 2026 Packers are all around better than the Jets or Giants imo. Tyrod .486 and Malik .500 hold virtually the same Win % at .500 area. Malik 98.9 passer in very small sample has outplayed Tyrod 87.7% passing, but not dramatically. Malik TD:INT is 2:1 and Tyrod TD:INT ratio is a smidge better at 2.1:1. Tyrods 5.6 per carry is actually a better rushing average than Malik 5.5 per and who would guess that? Malik 200% has the youth and longevity upside, but Tyrod by far has more raw experience to step into a pressure cooker and remain poised. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Training Camp - Preseason Observations
Latest: milani
36 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: rmontro
Today at 10:18 PM
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Fantasy Football League
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 10:01 PM
Fantasy Football
Are we going to Miss Malik Willis?
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 8:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 7:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are we going to Miss Malik Willis?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
