Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are the Packers better off not having a #3 QB on the roster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Veretax" data-source="post: 208546" data-attributes="member: 1092"><p>Personally I'd like to see them Keep Grant, and either Jackson or Wynn, let go the rest. But looking at the Roster Herron is signed through 2008 (wouldn't be major to cut if we needed space) Hall Jackson and Wynn are all signed through 2010, with Jackson having the biggest Cap hit I believe.</p><p></p><p>But with all the good running backs in the draft this year, I gotta think it might be to our benefit to shrink our running backs down and try to draft someone. There really isn't any good reason to keep 6 RBs on active roster even if one of them is on Special teams. Of course, the think that makes me itchy on this, is that it took a few games before the running attack really gelled. I'm not sure how much of that is due to Grant, and how much due to the Oline. :/</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Veretax, post: 208546, member: 1092"] Personally I'd like to see them Keep Grant, and either Jackson or Wynn, let go the rest. But looking at the Roster Herron is signed through 2008 (wouldn't be major to cut if we needed space) Hall Jackson and Wynn are all signed through 2010, with Jackson having the biggest Cap hit I believe. But with all the good running backs in the draft this year, I gotta think it might be to our benefit to shrink our running backs down and try to draft someone. There really isn't any good reason to keep 6 RBs on active roster even if one of them is on Special teams. Of course, the think that makes me itchy on this, is that it took a few games before the running attack really gelled. I'm not sure how much of that is due to Grant, and how much due to the Oline. :/ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
Poppa San
tynimiller
Latest posts
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Poppa San
13 minutes ago
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 11:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 8:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are the Packers better off not having a #3 QB on the roster?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top