Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="all about da packers" data-source="post: 208530" data-attributes="member: 227">Do you think the Packers should use a spot on the 53-man roster for a #3 QB?It'd certainly be useful to have another QB to take snaps and be capable of filling in if A-Rod gets injured next season (not to imply A-Rod is injury prone), or if both Favre and A-Rod go down in a game (possible, but not probable).Personally though, I'd rather use that position for an extra position player, like a WR/DT/CB. WR - Perhaps use the spot on someone with potential like Bodiford.DT - Keep an extra DT in case we experience injuries to that position like the past year (keep 6 DTs on the roster)CB - keep a raw but very talented individual on the roster, perhaps a draft pick that has potential but needs ton of work. That player would serve as a replacement for Blackmon if/when he gets injured.The week after the Cowboys game, where Brett was injured and A-Rod got injured during practice, has made me less opposed to the idea of having a spot taken up by a QB to be our #3 guy. But in the long run, I think it'd be better for the Packers to use that roster spot on a player at a position other than QB.</blockquote>

Total: 340 (members: 3, guests: 337)