Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are the Packers better built for turf than Lambeau?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HatestheEagles084" data-source="post: 6812" data-attributes="member: 180"><p>yeah</p><p></p><p>I'm a believer that the defensive line can control a game, I love guys like Grady Jackson that demand double teams (too bad his effectiveness is negated by Cleditus Hunt)...I lean toward physical players that bring energy, its why pre-draft I wanted the Packers to take Matt Roth, a warrior, something the Packers don't have. </p><p></p><p>Physical corners don't exist in football anymore thanks to the contact rules, we need production out of the safety position. Interceptions--something Earl Little and Arturo Freeman have been consistent in doing the last few seasons, and we need safeties to negate the run, I'm excited for Marviel Underwood, he can be a force against the run and the pass. Nick Collins is a "physical, aggressive" player, i hope so, i hope thats the direction this team goes, we'll see </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We've got a ton of offensive line depth, running back depth, one of the best running games in football, I think we'll hold our own outdoors</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HatestheEagles084, post: 6812, member: 180"] yeah I'm a believer that the defensive line can control a game, I love guys like Grady Jackson that demand double teams (too bad his effectiveness is negated by Cleditus Hunt)...I lean toward physical players that bring energy, its why pre-draft I wanted the Packers to take Matt Roth, a warrior, something the Packers don't have. Physical corners don't exist in football anymore thanks to the contact rules, we need production out of the safety position. Interceptions--something Earl Little and Arturo Freeman have been consistent in doing the last few seasons, and we need safeties to negate the run, I'm excited for Marviel Underwood, he can be a force against the run and the pass. Nick Collins is a "physical, aggressive" player, i hope so, i hope thats the direction this team goes, we'll see We've got a ton of offensive line depth, running back depth, one of the best running games in football, I think we'll hold our own outdoors [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
edensmage
Calebs Revenge
Latest posts
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: OldSchool101
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: edensmage
12 minutes ago
Draft Talk
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Today at 7:33 PM
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Dantés
Today at 7:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are the Packers better built for turf than Lambeau?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top