Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are the Packers better built for turf than Lambeau?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ArizonaPackerFan" data-source="post: 6810" data-attributes="member: 53"><p>I thought the Vikings, Lions, Colts, Falcons, and Rams all played in Domes, while the Texans played on turf in a stadium with a retractable roof that was closed when we played there last year. Dallas has an incomplete dome <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>I guess maybe I should rephrase the question.</p><p></p><p>Are the Packers better built for turf than Tundra?</p><p></p><p>After the loss to Vick and the Falcons in the playoffs, many people thought we needed more speed on defense to keep up with the mobil QBs like Vick and Culpepper. So we got smaller and faster at LB with guys like Barnett.</p><p></p><p>Last year and this year we added some speed in the secondary.</p><p></p><p>The loss to Jacksonville last year at home in December, and the loss to the Titans at home kind of bothered me though because it seemed like we were getting pushed around physically.</p><p></p><p>Does speed kill like they say, or would you rather have a more physical team like the 90's when we lined up 300 pounders across the D-line and had bigger, more physical corners?</p><p></p><p>Does speed kill on the frozen and sometimes muddy tundra? Just curious if others preferred speed or size when building a team for the frozen tundra. Maybe the day of the "mudders" is past.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ArizonaPackerFan, post: 6810, member: 53"] I thought the Vikings, Lions, Colts, Falcons, and Rams all played in Domes, while the Texans played on turf in a stadium with a retractable roof that was closed when we played there last year. Dallas has an incomplete dome :D I guess maybe I should rephrase the question. Are the Packers better built for turf than Tundra? After the loss to Vick and the Falcons in the playoffs, many people thought we needed more speed on defense to keep up with the mobil QBs like Vick and Culpepper. So we got smaller and faster at LB with guys like Barnett. Last year and this year we added some speed in the secondary. The loss to Jacksonville last year at home in December, and the loss to the Titans at home kind of bothered me though because it seemed like we were getting pushed around physically. Does speed kill like they say, or would you rather have a more physical team like the 90's when we lined up 300 pounders across the D-line and had bigger, more physical corners? Does speed kill on the frozen and sometimes muddy tundra? Just curious if others preferred speed or size when building a team for the frozen tundra. Maybe the day of the "mudders" is past. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:27 PM
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: edensmage
Yesterday at 10:16 PM
Draft Talk
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 7:33 PM
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 7:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are the Packers better built for turf than Lambeau?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top