PackerGeek
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2007
- Messages
- 58
- Reaction score
- 0
Okay now I actually mean this as a serious question so please try not to mock it too much. But, I have been watching all week as people complain about all these players being overpaid and it got me wondering if it was true. So if you consider that the salary cap went up from $85.5 mill by 17 million to $102.5 Mill the increase comes to about a roughly 19%. Would we not ( due to laws of supply and demand) expect roughly the same increase in salaries? If you consider that Charles Woodson got a 7 year 52 Mill contract last year as the best free agent corner available and Nate Clements contract is 8 years 80 Million it comes out to an increase of about 26%, A little high but maybe not completely out of line depending on how you see the drop off to the second best corner in FA. Thomas got less as the most coveted Line backer then Arrington got last year although he got a lot more in guaranteed money. I realize it's not always apples to apples because many things other than just salary effect how "Good" a contract is (Contract length relative to players age, Guarantees, etc). But it does make me wonder if a great deal of the increase in salaries isn't just the effect of the cap increase and not "overspending by crazy GM's"