Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Anyone worried about our ground game now!???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 295126" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>Why the fixation with a player that won't dress for the game?</p><p></p><p>For crying out loud. ANY back that we got wouldn't play the next game. You know why? BECAUSE THEY DON'T FRAKING KNOW THE PLAYBOOK! Nance is a mere insurance policy. He might be active someday to spell Bjax and Kuhn, but that's it.</p><p></p><p>The RBs in the Packers offense, LIKE IT OR NOT, have 3 roles.</p><p></p><p>1) To be effective enough so defenses are kept honest. It's not about being a great back; it's about being good enough. YOU DON'T KNOW IF JACKSON IS. The coaching staff thinks so.</p><p>2) Pass protect. Jackson is great at that. GREAT. Last year, he blocked freaking LaMar Woodley against Pitt. A RB BLOCKED ONE OF THE BEST PASS RUSHERS IN THE LEAGUE.</p><p>3) Be able to run the ball effectively to mantain the lead and kill the clock.</p><p></p><p>Moreso, the Packers do not play mutliple RBs a game. <strong>SINCE 2007, A BACKUP RB HAS NEVER HAD MORE THAN 75 CARRIES.</strong></p><p>Both Jackson and Kuhn did it effectively against a top 10 unit against the run in PHI. Jackson is the starter, Kuhn might play some more, but that's it.</p><p></p><p>The cry for an elite back is ludicrous, and it's never gonna happen. Lynch is not that back. The backs that fit our mold are Joseph Adday, Maurice Jones-Drew and Ray Rice.</p><p></p><p>Would the Packers welcome a talent like Peterson if he fell onto our lap? DAMN SURE.</p><p></p><p>But they will NOT look for it. Not when we already have the backs that fits our mold.</p><p></p><p>This is a passing offense. If you really think that we won't reach the SB because of running backs, I suggest you cheer for the RB-loving Chicago Bears or Minnesota Vikings.</p><p></p><p>The Green Bay Packers are all about Mr. Aaron Rodgers and his merry crew of receivers.</p><p></p><p>DEAL WITH IT.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 295126, member: 1429"] Why the fixation with a player that won't dress for the game? For crying out loud. ANY back that we got wouldn't play the next game. You know why? BECAUSE THEY DON'T FRAKING KNOW THE PLAYBOOK! Nance is a mere insurance policy. He might be active someday to spell Bjax and Kuhn, but that's it. The RBs in the Packers offense, LIKE IT OR NOT, have 3 roles. 1) To be effective enough so defenses are kept honest. It's not about being a great back; it's about being good enough. YOU DON'T KNOW IF JACKSON IS. The coaching staff thinks so. 2) Pass protect. Jackson is great at that. GREAT. Last year, he blocked freaking LaMar Woodley against Pitt. A RB BLOCKED ONE OF THE BEST PASS RUSHERS IN THE LEAGUE. 3) Be able to run the ball effectively to mantain the lead and kill the clock. Moreso, the Packers do not play mutliple RBs a game. [B]SINCE 2007, A BACKUP RB HAS NEVER HAD MORE THAN 75 CARRIES.[/B] Both Jackson and Kuhn did it effectively against a top 10 unit against the run in PHI. Jackson is the starter, Kuhn might play some more, but that's it. The cry for an elite back is ludicrous, and it's never gonna happen. Lynch is not that back. The backs that fit our mold are Joseph Adday, Maurice Jones-Drew and Ray Rice. Would the Packers welcome a talent like Peterson if he fell onto our lap? DAMN SURE. But they will NOT look for it. Not when we already have the backs that fits our mold. This is a passing offense. If you really think that we won't reach the SB because of running backs, I suggest you cheer for the RB-loving Chicago Bears or Minnesota Vikings. The Green Bay Packers are all about Mr. Aaron Rodgers and his merry crew of receivers. DEAL WITH IT. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
PackerDNA
sschind
King of Jeans
Latest posts
S
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Schultz
42 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:58 AM
Draft Talk
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Anyone worried about our ground game now!???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top