Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Any interest in Caleb Williams for 2024?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 1002927" data-attributes="member: 2846"><p>The cities of Oakland and San Diego are very foolish. More so San Diego. The stats on it where the city would see over $90 million in revenues year one from the chargers. The new stadium would have cost them around $60M a year in bond funding. Over the 20 year life of the stadium, the revenue would continually increase, the bond cost would not. And one Superbowl would bring in $20M itself.</p><p></p><p>And why did San Diego vote against the plan? Because they didn't want to help build a stadium for a billionaire. The NFL and Spanos were going to pay 40%. So damn worried about a rich guy getting richer, that they turn down 10s of millions per year of easy profit. Other cities offer to build multi billion dollar stadiums with no owner input for a reason. Because it is smart and lucrative.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AmishMafia, post: 1002927, member: 2846"] The cities of Oakland and San Diego are very foolish. More so San Diego. The stats on it where the city would see over $90 million in revenues year one from the chargers. The new stadium would have cost them around $60M a year in bond funding. Over the 20 year life of the stadium, the revenue would continually increase, the bond cost would not. And one Superbowl would bring in $20M itself. And why did San Diego vote against the plan? Because they didn't want to help build a stadium for a billionaire. The NFL and Spanos were going to pay 40%. So damn worried about a rich guy getting richer, that they turn down 10s of millions per year of easy profit. Other cities offer to build multi billion dollar stadiums with no owner input for a reason. Because it is smart and lucrative. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
Latest posts
H
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Heyjoe4
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Any interest in Caleb Williams for 2024?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top