Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1095479" data-attributes="member: 10086">Mostly good I’m on board through pick #120. I’m going to be honest I think 3 OL is excessive in your 2026 Mock. I like the Center pick and I’d really like to move Sean back to RG. I’m also a proponent of OL more than most in most drafts, just not in 2026 here’s why.1. We need a RB and It’s entirely possible to get someone like Kaytron Allen or Kaelon Black or someone in the RD4-6 area. So unless we have a behind the scenes arrangement at RB post draft? We’re not negating RB imo. 3 OL negates a RB.2.  In 2025 OL partly suffered because we had so many players miss time, playing injured or on IR. yet in 2026 we inject a group of drafted OL back into the mix in 2026 (assuming there’s normal recovery timetables). It’s highly unlikely to cut 3 or 4 guys who were drafted to get 3 new draftees. So max out OL with 2 selections? I think you’re good to go.I can’t really nitpick at your positional fits because I don’t have a clue what Brian is thinking in FA. Personally think we could see at least 1 more middle FA signing at a position we missed in this draft (calling $3-9Mil annual veteran). At DT or RB or EdgeI do like you picked back up into LB and QB move later. I think there’s above 50/50 we go after both.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 849 (members: 1, guests: 848)