Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Andrew Quarless arrested in South Beach
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Joe Nor Cal Packer" data-source="post: 615671" data-attributes="member: 9805"><p>Well that's a good point - after all it's a business. Leaving dead cap space is expensive, and has to be weighed with the subjective call on how a player affects the rest of the team, or if that's not an issue. If a player is still a contributor to a team, on the field and in the locker room, then he should probably be kept, and the legal system will do its thing. There will probably be a suspension involved, and that's why they pay the GM and coaches - to decide whether it's worth it to keep a player.</p><p></p><p>As another poster pointed out, these are not binary, yes/no decisions. Personally, I wouldn't want a marginal producer like Quarless on the team if he shows, as he has, great stupidity off the field. Then again, the Packers aren't exactly rich at TE. If Finley were still on the team and Quarless was 2 or 3 on the depth chart, it's a lot easier to jettison him.</p><p></p><p>I'm glad I don't have to make these decisions!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Joe Nor Cal Packer, post: 615671, member: 9805"] Well that's a good point - after all it's a business. Leaving dead cap space is expensive, and has to be weighed with the subjective call on how a player affects the rest of the team, or if that's not an issue. If a player is still a contributor to a team, on the field and in the locker room, then he should probably be kept, and the legal system will do its thing. There will probably be a suspension involved, and that's why they pay the GM and coaches - to decide whether it's worth it to keep a player. As another poster pointed out, these are not binary, yes/no decisions. Personally, I wouldn't want a marginal producer like Quarless on the team if he shows, as he has, great stupidity off the field. Then again, the Packers aren't exactly rich at TE. If Finley were still on the team and Quarless was 2 or 3 on the depth chart, it's a lot easier to jettison him. I'm glad I don't have to make these decisions! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
16 minutes ago
All Other Sports
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 8:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 7:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: AmishMafia
Yesterday at 6:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 5:53 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Andrew Quarless arrested in South Beach
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top