Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
All Sitton & Lang & OL threads merged
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 675779"><p>Well, as long as the Packers don't talk about the reasons for releasing Sitton there's no evidence the move was necessary. If, for example, Thompson cut the All-Pro guard because of his criticism of McCarthy's game plan at Arizona last year I don't agree it aas justified getting rid of a seasoned veteran.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers starting offensive line would have been one of the best in the league with Sitton on the team. With Taylor replacing him at left guard I expect the performance at that position to significantly drop off. Unfortunately the team doesn't have any depth at guard as none of the backups is best suited to play there.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Taylor was decent blocking for the run but struggled mightily in pass protection last season. Unfortunately keeping Rodgers upright is the most important assignment for an offensive lineman on the Packers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If cap savings were the reason for the move I would have preferred the Packers to keep Sitton this year and save $4.15 million on Taylor over the next two seasons.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 675779"] Well, as long as the Packers don't talk about the reasons for releasing Sitton there's no evidence the move was necessary. If, for example, Thompson cut the All-Pro guard because of his criticism of McCarthy's game plan at Arizona last year I don't agree it aas justified getting rid of a seasoned veteran. The Packers starting offensive line would have been one of the best in the league with Sitton on the team. With Taylor replacing him at left guard I expect the performance at that position to significantly drop off. Unfortunately the team doesn't have any depth at guard as none of the backups is best suited to play there. Taylor was decent blocking for the run but struggled mightily in pass protection last season. Unfortunately keeping Rodgers upright is the most important assignment for an offensive lineman on the Packers. If cap savings were the reason for the move I would have preferred the Packers to keep Sitton this year and save $4.15 million on Taylor over the next two seasons. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Packer Fan in SD
Calebs Revenge
Latest posts
Lions Give Jared Goff a 4 year, 212M Extension
Latest: Calebs Revenge
15 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
Free Agency Thread
Latest: milani
27 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: milani
28 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: thequick12
Today at 4:24 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Projecting Jordan Love in 2024
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 1:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
All Sitton & Lang & OL threads merged
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top