Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 675557" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I think with the kind of money they paid Taylor to keep him, he was destined to become the starter at one of the Guard positions.  Whatever negatives against Sitton and keeping him around beyond 2016 just happen to snowball and its obvious that was enough to speed up the move.  So while TT and Co. had a long term game plan when they re-signed Taylor, one would have to think that it wasn't Taylors superior play that tipped the scales to jettison Sitton early, but more an accumulation of something Sitton was doing or not doing and sadly, that scale tipped before the Packers had time to benefit from it (besides the cap savings).</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 74 (members: 2, guests: 72)