Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
All Sitton & Lang & OL threads merged
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 675547"><p>And they might have been drafted with the prior pick had the compensatory pick not been available, or they might have been drafted at the same spot in a trade up with a low round pick.</p><p></p><p>Drafting Sitton at #102 instead of Jeremy Thompson, rather than Sitton at #135 would not have constituted a loss. Obviously Thompson was valued above Sitton, which hardly supports the argument.</p><p></p><p>Daniels at #132 and McMillan at #133, both comp picks, helps to illustrate how the 4th. round is a crap shoot.</p><p></p><p>Accumulating a small handful of mid-to-low round picks merely provides an edge in increasing the odds, but it is not particularly substantial.</p><p></p><p>You could go the next ten years not getting a core player out of the 4th. round.</p><p></p><p>Getting a small edge against the odds is not something I get especially excited about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 675547"] And they might have been drafted with the prior pick had the compensatory pick not been available, or they might have been drafted at the same spot in a trade up with a low round pick. Drafting Sitton at #102 instead of Jeremy Thompson, rather than Sitton at #135 would not have constituted a loss. Obviously Thompson was valued above Sitton, which hardly supports the argument. Daniels at #132 and McMillan at #133, both comp picks, helps to illustrate how the 4th. round is a crap shoot. Accumulating a small handful of mid-to-low round picks merely provides an edge in increasing the odds, but it is not particularly substantial. You could go the next ten years not getting a core player out of the 4th. round. Getting a small edge against the odds is not something I get especially excited about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
tynimiller
shockerx
Latest posts
Starting 5 - CB
Latest: tynimiller
8 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Voyageur
30 minutes ago
College Sports
2022 Draft Romeo Doubs #132
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 11:56 AM
Draft Talk
Mediocre punters from da past and other things....
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 10:39 AM
NFL Discussions
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: SudsMcBucky
Today at 8:52 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
All Sitton & Lang & OL threads merged
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top