Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="longtimefan" data-source="post: 537820" data-attributes="member: 145">He also said this after that SD game<a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/33873/packers-8-0-and-wanting-much-more" target="_blank">http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/33873/packers-8-0-and-wanting-much-more</a>To me he is saying, they as players played bad and they need to get ways to rush the passer better...And get Clay in better situations.I dont think that is "ragging on the defensive calls" as you claim.....That is a leader knowing they need to do something else and went to his coach to figure out how to do itI would compare that to this Then Woodson once again is praising Dom<a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/34296/dom-capers-lets-the-packers-loose" target="_blank">http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/34296/dom-capers-lets-the-packers-loose</a>So what we have is a few times Woodson saying Dom wasnt doing enough, and a few times Woodson happy that Dom listened to him..Not really a strong argument that Dom should be firedWes Hodkiewicz  packer insider last few weeks claims that Dom shouldnt be blamed or let go..I still am okay if Dom is gone...HOWEVER----if he stays I am okay with it, as I am confident that MM knows the REAL issues with the defense..</blockquote>

Total: 638 (members: 1, guests: 637)