Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 523810">That's right.  I'm quoting cap numbers.  That's what I said originally if you care to go back and look.A player's cap number is the only number that matters.  At the same time, averages tell you little.  Once you look past the point where the guaranteed money is paid and the "dead cap" cost starts dropping, the out years of the contract are meaningless until you get there...the player could be cut, the money negotiated away, or if the player emerges as elite the figures could go up with a renegotiation.  It's best to stick with the immediate, known and most relevant determinants of where monetary resources are being applied...this year's cap number...and this defense is costing a good deal.Whichever number you choose, it does not speak to "value", the term you used, it speaks to "cost".  And we've spent a lot of picks and cap on this defensive to yield such inconsistent, and in some regards, miserable results (turnovers, red zone), representing poor "value".As for not reading the rest of your post.  I don't read every post, and I don't read every point in every post when it ceases to interest me.  That should not be unreasonable.  As you say, it's "easy to maintain a belief".  That's true whether you something or not, as you have evidenced here.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,066 (members: 0, guests: 1,066)