thetombradyhater
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 6, 2006
- Messages
- 989
- Reaction score
- 0
on another website a guy that I know decently well that seemed to know a lot about the NFL said this:
first he said: "Al harris is really overrated. I hope he doesnt get a new contract."
so i responded: "Al Harris overated? I though he was underated."
then he said the unthinkable "yeah id take Ahmad Caroll over him [Harris] anyday."
WHAT?!?!?!
I mean i had talked to this guy in a NFL forum and he seemed to know he was talking about... but COME ON!
another pack fan said: "Yes, because a CB who gets a foul every play deserves to be on the field" in responce to his comments
he responded but made it worse "im sure you know your corners more than I do, but im just saying I think his [Carrol] gonan turn out to be a better player than he is now, and a better player than harris ever will be."
then he said "hmm well to me he [Harris] is overrated, ill try and keep a lookout for him this year and maybe he will prove me wrong. when he was with the eagles i wasent impressed."
i bashed this guy saying "if you were not joking when you said you would take Carrol over Harris than, no offence but, you are an idiot. Al Harris is a quality starter probably top 15 CB in the league. Ahmad Carrol is a nickelback who commits penalties ALL THE TIME"
later on he said: "I just think his[harris] overrated!.......you want an underrated corner.....Terence Newman."
and: "I said he [Carrol] would be better. When harris was at the eagles he sucked, I was never impressed by him, so he goes to the packers and yeah i dont hear much about him i mean has he made a pro bowl? Im not saying his a bad corner im just saying his not as good as some of you make him seem."
and: "as in eventually he[Carroll] will be better [then Harris].
and lastly "I said id take him [Carroll], only because his younger and I think he has a better future, if you gave me one for one year then yes of course id take harris. You guys better hope im right and carroll turns into a solid corner."
I didn't edit anything he said only added []'s so sometimes when he said his he meant he's and there might be some other gramatical mistakes. Anyway isn't that just hillarious?
first he said: "Al harris is really overrated. I hope he doesnt get a new contract."
so i responded: "Al Harris overated? I though he was underated."
then he said the unthinkable "yeah id take Ahmad Caroll over him [Harris] anyday."
WHAT?!?!?!
I mean i had talked to this guy in a NFL forum and he seemed to know he was talking about... but COME ON!
another pack fan said: "Yes, because a CB who gets a foul every play deserves to be on the field" in responce to his comments
he responded but made it worse "im sure you know your corners more than I do, but im just saying I think his [Carrol] gonan turn out to be a better player than he is now, and a better player than harris ever will be."
then he said "hmm well to me he [Harris] is overrated, ill try and keep a lookout for him this year and maybe he will prove me wrong. when he was with the eagles i wasent impressed."
i bashed this guy saying "if you were not joking when you said you would take Carrol over Harris than, no offence but, you are an idiot. Al Harris is a quality starter probably top 15 CB in the league. Ahmad Carrol is a nickelback who commits penalties ALL THE TIME"
later on he said: "I just think his[harris] overrated!.......you want an underrated corner.....Terence Newman."
and: "I said he [Carrol] would be better. When harris was at the eagles he sucked, I was never impressed by him, so he goes to the packers and yeah i dont hear much about him i mean has he made a pro bowl? Im not saying his a bad corner im just saying his not as good as some of you make him seem."
and: "as in eventually he[Carroll] will be better [then Harris].
and lastly "I said id take him [Carroll], only because his younger and I think he has a better future, if you gave me one for one year then yes of course id take harris. You guys better hope im right and carroll turns into a solid corner."
I didn't edit anything he said only added []'s so sometimes when he said his he meant he's and there might be some other gramatical mistakes. Anyway isn't that just hillarious?