Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Actual Signed Roster For 2022
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 969725" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>You would think so right?</p><p></p><p>I’m not so sure though with all these WR dinged up currently. Pretty good argument (after the Khylin injury) that we think Watson’s full, unrealized potential + combined with draft capital used (#53 + #59) + a banged up WR room might change the tide back again. If we were operating at full strength and Watson was getting low usage anyway? Maybe a small chance they’d consider it. The Coaches obviously know he successfully fielded Kicks in the past. </p><p></p><p></p><p>No doubt in my mind that #9 is higher than #8. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/whistling.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":whistling:" title="Whistling :whistling:" data-shortname=":whistling:" /></p><p></p><p>They aren’t finished with the Amari project just yet imo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 969725, member: 10086"] You would think so right? I’m not so sure though with all these WR dinged up currently. Pretty good argument (after the Khylin injury) that we think Watson’s full, unrealized potential + combined with draft capital used (#53 + #59) + a banged up WR room might change the tide back again. If we were operating at full strength and Watson was getting low usage anyway? Maybe a small chance they’d consider it. The Coaches obviously know he successfully fielded Kicks in the past. No doubt in my mind that #9 is higher than #8. :whistling: They aren’t finished with the Amari project just yet imo. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Heyjoe4
PackerDNA
Latest posts
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
5 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 6:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: RepStar15
Today at 6:02 AM
Draft Talk
162-0
Latest: weeds
Today at 5:52 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 5:51 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Actual Signed Roster For 2022
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top